University of Maryland Logo Facilities Management Home
Contact Us


V. Implementation

The 11 principles listed at the beginning of Section IV are statements of the priorities that will guide planners. In the implementation of the plans for an enhanced environment and significantly improved traffic and pedestrian flow, for example, concerns for security of people and property will be a priority, as stated in the eleventh principle. Planners will be asked to design safety features into parking garages and shuttle connection points, to maintain well-lighted open spaces in areas with forest covering, and to provide secure facilities for bicycle storage. In addition, as new shuttle service arrangements, parking, and vehicular traffic patterns are instituted, every effort will be made to accommodate the needs of those with disabilities and to address concerns of the large numbers of commuting students. Traffic designers will also be asked to include flexibility in the system of restricted roads necessary to respond to exceptional needs of faculty, staff, students, or guests to access particular campus areas, for example, to attend special events at the Memorial Chapel, athletic arenas, or Clarice Smith Performing Arts Center.

The outlines of this Master Plan allow the university to take advantage of special opportunities off campus. Specifically, the plan provides flexibility for interaction with a Purple Line in the Washington area metro system, which would offer a welcome new means for transportation to the campus. Though specific metro stop sites have not yet been designated, it is assumed that at least one Purple Line station will be located on or adjacent to campus, with the exact siting dependent on the final route of the Purple Line. The university intends to advocate for a metro system that offers maximum access to the campus.

While allowing for flexibility to respond to a variety of opportunities, the plan also sets standards to guide future development. The principles stated in the plan will provide a valuable guide to any development that might occur if, as an example, the 2012 Olympics are held in the Baltimore-Washington region. If the Olympics are held in this region, the campus would be a primary location for events. Acting in accordance with this plan, the university's goal would be to arrange special accommodations for participants and visitors with attention to the guidelines set forth in this plan, protecting to the extent possible the environmental qualities and architectural unity envisioned in this document.

Implementation of specific projects occurs under the oversight of the Office of Facilities Management. A hallmark of this planning process has been consultation with a wide range of constituencies, and the Master Plan Steering Committee has sought input and advice throughout the planning procedure. As development of each district goes forward, and specific projects are implemented, campus planners will continue this process of consultation and discuss issues with all concerned stakeholders-- faculty, staff, students, and local officials. In areas in which university faculty members and staff have special expertise, their advice and insight will be especially welcomed.

To achieve the environmental vision set forth in the plan, for example, much collective and continued work needs to be done by the entire campus community in research, education, planning, and implementation. It is expected that the Facilities Management staff will work collaboratively with appropriate academic units and departments, outside consultants, and the university leadership in setting and reaching specific goals. The university will also continue to seek support from local communities, county and state legislators, friends, and donors.

Environmental stewardship and effective management of vehicle and pedestrian movement, as presented in this plan, constitute major new emphases for the campus. Careful oversight and implementation of environmental and traffic control projects are essential to fulfilling the vision of the plan.

The plan for implementation of capital projects below will guide the siting and timing of future development of buildings on the campus. Recommended capital improvements have been assigned to one of three planning periods based on the institution's most critical needs and assumptions concerning funding availability. An appropriate balance between building, infrastructure, and landscape improvements is proposed. The infrastructure and landscape improvements recommended in each planning period are necessary to support the proposed additional building square footage. Infrastructure projects include utilities, satellite central utility buildings, roads, and transit systems. Landscape projects include ecological restoration, open space enhancements, new open spaces, reforestation and tree planting, and hydrology/storm water management projects. The cost figures are estimates in 2002 dollars.

Infrastructure upgrades to be funded via the Energy Performance Contract are not included, as many specific scopes, costs, and locations have not been finalized. Most of these infrastructure upgrades are expected to be completed within the 2001-2005 Planning Period.

Summary of All Planning Periods

The total square footages and costs for new facilities, building renewals, building demolitions, infrastructure, and landscape improvements for all planning periods are reflected in Table 10. In total, we expect to add approximately 9.1 million GSF of new space and renew 3.3 million GSF of existing space. To meet program requirements, approximately 0.7 million GSF of existing space will be demolished. The total cost for all facilities and related infrastructure and landscape improvements is estimated to be approximately $2.4 billion.

Table 10
Summary Table
Areas of Need/Project Types* # of
Projects
Total
GSF
Total
Costs
(in $1000's)
1. Planned New Construction 60 9,019,489 1,754,545
2. Planned Building Renewal 48 3,274,272 533,650
3. Planned Building Demolition 70 683,002 **
4. Planned Infrastructure Improvements 21 39,874 49,750
5. Planned Landscape Improvements 25 0 34,270
 
*Excludes High Density Library Storage Facility proposed off-campus. Also excludes undesignated building sites.
**Cost is associated with the project that necessitates the demolition.


Site locations for all program requirements are identified in Figures 18, 19 and 20. In addition, undesignated building sites are identified in Figure 20 to provide additional capacity for unanticipated program needs and opportunities or to serve as alternate locations for identified program needs. A total of 36 undesignated building sites with a total capacity of 3.6 million GSF are identified. In addition, one landscape improvement project that supports some of the undesignated building sites is identified.

2001 - 2005 Planning Period

New building construction projects in the first planning period, 2001- 2005, include funded or partially funded projects and projects which are recommended in the Governor's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or Board of Regents System Funded Construction Program (SFCP) for the planning period.

Facilities and related infrastructure and landscape improvements are recommended in this first planning period representing a total cost of approximately $903 million as summarized in Table 11. Approximately 5.1 million new and renewed GSF are projected to be available for use in the 2001 - 2005 time period. Table 12 lists all the new construction projects planned for this time period. Figure 18 depicts all projects in this period.

Table 11
2001-2005 Planning Period
Areas of Need/Project Types # of
Projects
Total
GSF
Total
Costs
(in $1000's)
1. Planned New Construction 25 4,608,789 801,445
2. Planned Building Renewal 7 500,200 72,450
3. Planned Building Demolition 31 302,883 **
4. Planned Infrastructure Improvements 8 13,249 14,350
5. Planned Landscape Improvements 9 0 14,970
 
**Cost is associated with the project that necessitates the demolition.


Table 12
2001- 2005 Planning Period:
Planned New Construction
Site Project GSF Cost
(in $1,000's)
Potential Fund Source(s)
N1 Kim Engineering Bldg. 141,300 50,000 State
N2 Chemistry Teaching Bldg. 58,500 30,200 State
N3 Computer Science Instructional Center 37,222 10,300 System
N4 Research Greenhouse Complex 65,500 17,500 State
N5 Van Munching Hall Addition 103,000 24,800 State, Institutional, Private
N6 Riggs Alumni Center 60,000 20,500 Private/Institutional
N7 MFRI Headquarters Addition 20,000 5,200 State
N8 Operations & Maintenance Shops Relocation 61,800 11,100 System
N9 Motor Pool Relocation 9,300 1,700 System
N10 Campus Mail Facility Relocation 5,800 1,000 System
N11 Service Building Relocation 72,600 13,100 System
N12 Shuttle UM Relocation 10,500 1,900 System
N13 Softball Stadium 2,635 3,900 State
N14 Gossett Team House Addition 18,700 5,700 Private
N15 Health Center Addition/Renovation 51,900 14,000 System
N16 Mowatt Lane Parking Garage 525,000 18,200 System
N17 Campus Drive Parking Garage (1,600 spaces) 560,000 18,700 System
N18 Comcast Arena 470,000 126,845 State, Private, System
N19 Arena Parking Garage 360,000 16,300 System
N20 East Campus Mixed Use Development Phase 1 - (Includes Conference Center) 1,280,000 256,000 Public-Private Partnership
N21 Housing/(600 beds) 145,000 28,000 Public-Private Partnership
N22 New IT Building at College Park Metro site (part of Carrier Hotel) 219,000 54,800 Public-Private Partnership
N23 Day Care Facility 13,500 2,500 Public-Private Partnership
N24 Laboratory for Telecommunication Sciences 85,000 25,000 Public-Private Partnership
N25 Capstone Housing (799 beds) 232,532 44,200 Public-Private Partnership
Projects are not presented in priority order.


2006 - 2010 Planning Period

The construction of approximately 1.9 million GSF of new and renewed space is planned to meet identified program requirements in this period. The total cost for new facilities, building renewals, and infrastructure and landscape improvements in this planning period is approximately $319 million as shown in Table 13. Figure 19 depicts projects in this planning period.

Table 13
2006-2010 Planning Period
Areas of Need/Project Types # of
Projects
Total
GSF
Total
Costs
(in $1000's)
1. Planned New Construction 9 1,310,000 215,100
2. Planned Building Renewal 11 521,019 74,800
3. Planned Building Demolition 4 33,760 **
4. Planned Infrastructure Improvements 9 26,625 22,950
5. Planned Landscape Improvements 7 0 5,850
 
**Cost is associated with the project that necessitates the demolition.


2011 and Beyond Planning Period

The total cost for new facilities, building renewals, and infrastructure and landscape improvements in this period is approximately $1.2 billion as reflected in Table 14. Figure 20 depicts projects in this period.
Table 14
2011 and Beyond Planning Period
Areas of Need/Project Types* # of
Projects
Total
GSF
Total
Costs
(in $1000's)
1. Planned New Construction 26 3,100,700 738,000
2. Planned Building Renewal 30 2,253,053 386,400
3. Planned Building Demolition 35 346,359 **
4. Planned Infrastructure Improvements 4 0 12,450
5. Planned Landscape Improvements 9 0 13,450
 
*Excludes High Density Library Storage Facility and New Storage Facility proposed off-campus. Also excludes undesignated building sites.
**Cost is associated with the project that necessitates the demolition.


Master Plan Home

UM Home | UM Holiday Schedule | UM Directories | UM Search | Weather | Div. of Admin. Affairs | ARES
UM Emergency Preparedness | Dept. of Public Safety | Dept. of Environmental Safety | Dept. of Procurement & Supply
Maintained by University of Maryland Facilities Management